Behring wins suit against USCIS – EB-5 regional centers back in business

MGC EB-5

The US District Court for the Northern District of California issued a decision today in Behring Regional Center’s lawsuit seeking a preliminary injunction to stop United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) from deauthorizing previously designated EB-5 Regional Centers.

“We are relieved to have the courts favor in issuing the preliminary injunction stopping USCIS from canceling EB-5 regional centers,” said Colin Behring, CEO of the Behring Companies.  “The ruling is strong and clear in its language that EB-5 is to continue immediately. Our investors asked us to do everything we could to fix this and our team at Behring and the EB-5 Investment Coalition delivered. This was our third lawsuit with USCIS, and with this ruling, we are heading toward victory on the merits of all of them.”

EB-5 regional centers can continue working immediately, the verdict said

Congress enacted the Reform and Integrity Act in March 2022, reauthorizing and revamping the system that oversees regional centers. The suit alleged that the USCIS wrongly interpreted the Act as deauthorizing the more than 600 previously authorized regional centers and putting an end to their revenue streams. The lawsuit said the agency’s guidance violates the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and misinterprets the new EB-5 law enacted by Congress.

The court found that the USCIS “violated the APA” and added that it “was almost certainly wrong in assuming that the Integrity Act affirmatively deauthorized existing regional centers, so the agency was almost certainly wrong to announce that the centers are no longer authorized.”

The court has ordered USCIS to not require previously designated regional centers to go through steps to be reauthorized. It also required that the USCIS process new I-526 petition from immigrant investors investing through previously authorized regional centers. The ruling is a big win for the EB-5 industry and investor stakeholders.

“We are so pleased that the court recognized the true congressional intent.  Existing regional centers can now operate and accept new investors,” says Laura Foote Reiff, a partner at Greenberg Traurig LLP, which represents Behring in the lawsuit over the USCIS guidance. “This is a program that should be embraced by the agency and the country as it brings much-needed revenue into the US and helps with job creation.”

Behring regional center wins case against USCIS and clears the way for EB-5 processing

Before issuing his ruling, Judge Vince Chhabria concluded with an analogy, likening Behring and other regional centers to members of a club created by Congress that gave the USCIS the responsibility of admitting members, creating club rules, and club privileges. But with the Integrity Act, Congress made many changes to the club’s structure but failed to specify whether existing members could, like before, remain members. Then the agency removed all existing members, based on what they thought Congress wanted.

“The agency was wrong to act based on that assumption,” Chhabria said. “But it does mean that, for now, the agency must continue treating the existing members as members of the newly revamped club. The motion for a preliminary injunction is granted.”

The lawsuit follows the firm’s 2021 legal victory when a federal judge vacated the EB-5 Modernization Rule that was implemented unlawfully by the Department of Homeland Security in 2019.

“The nationwide injunction decision is huge for the US EB-5 visa program industry and means investors can file immediately, especially for the new fast track categories created by the Reform and Integrity Act signed by President Biden on March 15, 2022,” says Bernard Wolfsdorf an LA-based immigration lawyer. “There will be a frenzy of filings with all the pent-up demand.”

Related Post

Countries for Residency by Investment

Top Countries for Residency by Investment in 2024

Residency by investment is one of the best ways to migrate to another country to explore better living and financial opportunities or for economic expansion. The residency by investment programs come with various additional perks and benefits. They make the applicant eligible to enjoy elevated living conditions, facilities, and various other amenities after migrating to another country.  However, there are various rules, regulatory legal obligations, and criteria that applicants have to fulfill to acquire eligibility

Comparison of residency and citizenship options

Residency vs. Citizenship: Which One is Right for You?

Citizenship by investment program was first launched on the Caribbean island in the 1980s. Now it’s quite famous among investors worldwide. According to the 2019 EU report over 131,000 people obtained residency and citizenship through this program between 2011 and 2019. Countries like Spain, Greece, Cyprus, and Malta brought around €21.4 billion in revenue. There are several ways to get citizenship and residency for investors in a country, but people get confused between residency and

Citizenship by Investment Program

How to Choose Right Citizenship by Investment Program

Various types of investment migration laws are in force globally. Of these approximately 30 residence or citizenship by investment programs are running successfully. Entrepreneurs are adopting citizenship by investment options as the most effective way to access previously unimagined opportunities. Worldwide, 30 countries are providing residence and citizenship by investment program but currently, 11 countries provide a direct route to citizenship by investment. In 2022 more than 1,370 citizenship by investment applications were submitted in